Covid-19 Vaccine
Teri Fedler
January 28, 2021
Covid-19 Vaccine: December 2020 – January 2021
In the Toronto Star, it was recently reported, “How to discuss the COVID-19 vaccine with those who want to avoid getting it.” “The commenters express some hesitation about receiving their dose of a fast-tracked vaccination, which they argue has been approved too quickly, with future effects still unknown.” “Unlike those who are “anti-vax” and vehemently oppose vaccination or laws that regulate vaccination, people who are vaccine hesitant may delay or refuse being vaccinated despite the existence of thorough scientific research into vaccinations.”
“Maya Goldenberg, an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Guelph [in Canada] and author of the forthcoming book “Vaccine Hesitancy” said, “Approaching conversations with vaccine hesitant family members should be done in a way that is patient and kind.” “Listening attentively to specific concerns and not being dismissive is key.” “Building up a rapport and showing kindness can bridge the gap and help people come to terms with being vaccinated.” “You might find resistant people becoming at least more open to talking and considering why, for example, this vaccine might present as an opportunity rather than a threat.” “In cases where people have become wrapped up in unfounded conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 vaccines, she suggests not engaging in a discussion to try to prove them wrong.” “Conspiracy theories are sort of crafted in a way that you can’t just disprove them on a factual basis.” “If you weaken one point, there’s another that’s … going to come up. So I’d say just wait for them to come around.”
But I wouldn’t say they are “conspiracy theories” so much as fear and concerns and questions about this particle vaccine because of its “warp speed” and “mRNA ‘new’ technology” that scientists are saying aren’t new but I am concerned about, and its “proteins” that can cause all sorts of stress and trauma and struggle and anxiety in a body, along with “nanoparticles” being injected that cannot be removed should there become a problem in the body and/or mind.
“Omar Khan, an assistant professor at the Institute of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Toronto, said that while Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has been approved for emergency use in Canada faster than is usual, the standards of approval have not changed.” But here’s what gets me right here, “While the MRNA
TECHNOLOGY USED IN THE COVID-19 VACCINES IS NEW TO CONSUMERS, it’s been studied for years,” he said. I am very concerned that this is “new to consumers.”
Omar Khan said, “It’s in a variety of CLINICAL TRIALS and OTHER FORMS. So it’s not like this is brand new.” But according to Mr. Khan, it is brand new to consumers who have not experienced this “new mRNA technology” in their bodies and our public. And I wonder what “VARIETY of TRIALS” and “OTHER FORMS” they’ve tested it in that he makes no mention of or their results. We can “assume” good results, but what were the trials and errors, and how many “years” has this “new technology” been studied? And has it been studied in test humans or only rodents and animals?
Mr. Khan also said, “How you talk to a relative that is vaccine hesitant is going to vary depending on the person.” “Like Goldenberg, he warned against becoming combative. “We never want it to be a combative argument or combative conversation, especially (with) someone that’s very entrenched in their opinion ~ we have to respect that.” But I don’t believe many people are very “entrenched in their opinion” regarding this vaccine, like they are with childhood vaccines, but are more so concerned and fearful of this vaccine because of its “warp speed” development and this strain of Coronavirus being “new” to consumers and the public, and mRNA technology that is also new to consumers and the public, and “nanoparticles” that I am all very concerned about. For vaccines normally take years and “sometimes decades” to develop and test and improve and approve for public safety use.
Business Insider said, “In the US, vaccine development undergoes a specific set of steps that includes exploratory phases, pre-clinical trials, new drug application, four phases of vaccine trials, and thorough vetting from the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration.
All of that combined could take multiple years, and even then, it might not be as effective as hoped.” Derek Lowe, author of the industry blog In The Pipeline who has more than 30 years of experience in drug discovery, told Business Insider, “I would be extremely happy to be wrong, but I don't really see how a vaccine can get put together in time to help out with the likely course of this current outbreak."
Omar Khan, “suggested telling people who are opposed to receiving their shots that you intend to get one yourself to stay safe and do your part to stop the spread.” But I can’t follow Mr. Khan’s advice because I don’t intend to get one myself. For I take very good care of my health and had to work very hard to overcome viruses with critically low white blood cell count and extremely low red blood cell count and a whole host of other major health problems and deficiencies and weaknesses and challenges along with excruciating pain in body and toxic sufferings with pressure and bloating and dehydration and a severely compromised and debilitated immune system and allergies and asthma and intestinal bloating and cramping and chronic constipation and exhaustion and fatigue, not to mention the vaccines I received as a kid and wondering what all this heavy metal poisoning was doing in my body along with dental fillings as I also suffered mercury poisoning and my tongue became like a battery against my teeth, along with a huge painful lump in my breast and suffering all of this at once for many years with no real accurate diagnosis or cure and having to fight against viruses and vaccines and sicknesses and diseases without medications or further vaccines or steroids, chemo or radiation.
Mr. Khan also said, “Saying ‘it’s important for me, I have you in my life, and I have kids and other people … who would really benefit from me being protected,’ may go a long way in convincing loved ones to do the same.” And as much as I would love to keep my family and kids in my life and not get this virus and stay alive, I am very concerned what this “warp speed” vaccine with “new technology” to the people and public with “nanoparticles” could do to my family’s health and brain in the future; along with mine. Mr. Khan also said,
“Sometimes it takes some people a while to get used to something new, and that can be scary.” But what also really concerns me is “nanoparticles.” What are they? And I don’t want them in my body, or strange proteins.
STAT News, in Boston, MA [a “media company focused on finding and telling compelling stories about health, medicine, and scientific discovery”] said, “Lipid nanoparticles are the fatty molecular envelopes that help strands of mRNA - the genetic messenger for making DNA code into proteins ~ evade the body’s biological gatekeepers and reach their target cell without being degraded.” “These carriers are used to package the active chemicals in drugs such as the chemotherapy Doxil or the cholesterol-lowering medicines Repatha and Praluent so they get to their targets with fewer unwanted side effects. And nanoparticles are being investigated to ferry the genome-editing CRISPR-Cas9 to target organs, in hopes of solving another delivery challenge.” And CRISPR “is a molecule that finds a string of DNA code, locks on and makes a precision cut.” “And because scientists can tune it to target any genetic sequence, they can use it to turn genes off or replace them with new versions.”
In December 2019, Science Alert wrote, “New Details About The Infamous 'CRISPR Babies' Experiment Have Just Been Revealed.” “More than a year ago, the world was shocked by Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui's attempt to use CRISPR technology to modify human embryos and make them resistant to HIV, which led to the birth of twins Lulu and Nana.” “Now, crucial details have been revealed in a recent release of excerpts from the study, which have triggered a series of concerns about how Lulu and Nana's genome was modified.” “How CRISPR works - CRISPR is a technique that allows scientists to make precise edits to any DNA by altering its sequence. When using CRISPR, you may be trying to "knock out" a gene by rendering it inactive, or trying to achieve specific modifications, such as introducing or removing a desired piece of DNA. Gene editing with the CRISPR system relies on an association of two proteins. One of the proteins, called Cas9, is responsible for "cutting" the DNA. The other protein is a short RNA (ribonucleic acid) molecule which works as a "guide" that brings Cas9 to the position where it is supposed to cut. The system also needs help from the cells being edited. DNA damage is frequent, so cells regularly have to repair the DNA lesions. The associated repair mechanisms are what introduce the deletions, insertions or modifications when performing gene editing.” And MIT Technology Review reported that same month saying, “China’s CRISPR babies…” “He Jiankui’s manuscript shows how he ignored ethical and scientific norms in creating the gene-edited twins Lulu and Nana.” “Titled “Birth of Twins
After Genome Editing for HIV Resistance,” and 4,699 words long, the still unpublished paper was authored by He Jiankui, the Chinese biophysicist who created the edited twin girls. A second manuscript we also received discusses laboratory research on human and animal embryos. The metadata in the files we were sent indicate that the two draft papers were edited by He in late November 2018 and appear to be what he initially submitted for publication. Other versions, including a combined manuscript, may also exist. After consideration by at least two prestigious journals, Nature and JAMA, his research remains unpublished. The text of the twins paper is replete with expansive claims of a medical breakthrough that can “control the HIV epidemic.” It claims “success”—a word used more than once—in using a “novel therapy” to render the girls resistant to HIV. Yet surprisingly, it makes little attempt to prove that the twins really are resistant to the virus. And the text largely ignores data elsewhere in the paper suggesting that the editing went wrong. We shared the unpublished manuscripts with four experts—a legal scholar, an IVF doctor [invitro fertilization], an embryologist, and a gene-editing specialist—and asked them for their reactions. Their views were damning. Among them: key claims that He and his team made are not supported by the data; the babies’ parents may have been under pressure to agree to join the experiment; the supposed medical benefits are dubious at best; and the researchers moved forward with creating living human beings before they fully understood the effects of the edits they had made. Because these documents relate to one of the most important public interest issues of all time—the ability to change human heredity using technology—we here present excerpts from the “twins” manuscript, together with some of the experts’ comments, and explain the questions they raise. The excerpts are in the order in which they appear in the paper. To understand why the manuscripts have remained unpublished up to now, read the accompanying article on He's attempts to get them into scientific journals. For the case for making their content public, read the op-ed by Kiran Musunuru, a gene-editing specialist at the University of
Pennsylvania, who argues the Chinese data shows that gene-editing for reproduction is unsafe and premature.” And without explanation here of each excerpt, they are as follows in oder:
1. Why aren’t the doctors among the paper’s authors?
2. The researchers’ own data don’t support their main claims
3. Gene-editing embryos won’t bring HIV under control, especially in the worst-affected countries
4. The parents might have wanted to take part for the wrong reasons
a. Contrary to some interpretations, the point of using CRISPR on the babies’ DNA wasn’t to prevent them from catching HIV from their father, who was infected. As the paper describes, this was achieved by sperm washing, a well-established technique. Instead, the purpose of the editing was to give the children immunity to HIV later in life. Thus, the experiment didn’t provide clear, immediate medical benefits to either the parents or the children. Why did the couple agree? One reason may have been to access fertility treatment at all.
5. The gene edits weren’t the same as the mutations that confer natural HIV resistance
6. There could have been other, unwanted CRISPR edits
7. The doctors treating the couple may not have known what was going on
8. The manuscript misrepresents when the babies were born (November vs October in an attempt to make their reidentification even more difficult)
9. It’s not clear if there was a proper ethics review
10. The researchers didn’t test whether the HIV immunity worked before creating living human beings
11. An American [2006] Nobelist may have helped He justify his experiment
12. The project had other supporters, but some key information is missing
13. The researchers ignored evidence that the gene edits weren’t uniform
But with all this medical “technology” designed and created in labs and injected into our bodies, I’m concerned we, as a people and doctors and nurses and scientists and biologists, are straying away from the very basic principles and simple procedures of life and health that our bodies so desperately need to heal and overcome sickness and disease and maintain good health without all this medical intervention and scientific experiments and medical breakthroughs that may be causing us more harm than good with brain and muscle and tissue and ligament and organ toxicity and depletion of what is truly needed that has always been scoffed at and laughed at and not understood or taken seriously therefore turning our life and health and bodies into scientific experiments and projects in a lab with fingers crossed and a hope and a prayer that all works out in the end while getting further and further away from the basic principles of health and healing and life by God our Father and what Jesus Christ our Lord has already given us and designed in us with nature and His creation.
And as commendable as it is that Pfizer rejected government funding and “warp speed” and politics concerning President Trump and the government, my concern with their vaccine is the absolute freezing cold temperature required for storage and what’s in it that it has to be kept SO cold, and what happens if it slightly warms or thaws just a bit during transport and storage to the injection site but still so completely frozen just not as frozen, and how long can it remain room at temperature before injecting and not go bad, and will it be rightly monitored through all of this? The New York post reported last month [December 2020], “Several thousands of doses of the COVID-19 vaccine had to be returned to Pfizer due to an “anomaly” that caused storage temperatures to plunge during shipment, officials said…” “The trays - which contain 975 doses each - were being closely monitored en route to CA and AL when the temperature dropped from minus 80 degrees Celsius to minus 92 degrees, according to Gen. Gustave Perna, the head of Operation Warp Speed.” “Pfizer’s vaccine must be stored in ultra-cold freezers at minus 70 degrees Celsius, but it is unclear how the vaccine reacts to temperatures much lower than that.” “We locked those trays down,” said Perna at a press briefing. “They never left the truck. We returned them immediately to Pfizer and we sent immediate shipments to replace those two trays.” “Perna added that the FDA and Pfizer are working on determining whether the “anomaly” rendered the vaccines unsafe.” “We’re taking no chances,” he said.” “He said officials are still “learning, but the key is we can see [for] ourselves and we were able to take action.” So in this case, the temperature went colder than what is required for preservation.
The New York Times reported on Pfizer’s vaccine Dec. 8th, “The news - the first results from any late-stage vaccine trial - buoyed stock markets and spirits as the public saw a glimmer of hope. But it’s worth noting that the news is still preliminary, and there is much that is still not known about how well the vaccine works.” “And one thing remained clear: The vaccine will not come in time to rescue the world from the next several months, when the virus will take many more lives unless the public takes more stringent public health measures.” “…early analysis suggests the vaccine is over 90 percent effective.” But I do not plan on getting this vaccine, nor am I an “antivaxxer” but am certainly “vaxxer hesitant.” I do hope and pray that the vaccines for Covid-19 are as effective as scientists and health officials say they are, and that the public does not suffer any other health challenges because of it or severe or permanent side effects from it, including brain fog or mental incapacity or vulnerabilities or thought in the future. And I do understand why front-line and essential workers and the elderly and most vulnerable need to get the vaccine to protect themselves and keep doing their job and/or avoid infection and possibly not survive it. But I certainly do hope that our nation and the world does not make it mandatory for everyone with body screening to detect nanoparticles in our blood stream and prevent those without them from entering stores and schools and churches and businesses and public places or conducting business. For Dr. Christiane Northrup of women’s health in Yarmouth, Maine spoke her concerns regarding this
vaccine saying, “there’s never been a vaccine like this – it’s an RNA vaccine – it is what’s called trans-infection – it will fundamentally change people’s DNA – and what I don’t like about it even more than the usual thing about the toxic metals that are in vaccines that make our bodies literally into an antenna with 5G, this one has the usual non-human DNA (like monkeys, maybe fetal cells, pigs, whatever) and so it begins to make us what’s called chimers (pronounced kimers) introducing non-human DNA into our bodies.” Britannica defines “Chimera, in genetics, an organism or tissue that contains at least two different sets of DNA, most often originating from the fusion of as many different zygotes (fertilized eggs).” (Zygotes definition: “a diploid cell [“a cell that contains two complete sets of chromosomes”] resulting from the fusion of two haploid gametes [“reproductive cells in sexually reproducing organisms that fuse with one another during fertilization.”]; a fertilized ovum.” “The term [Chimera] is derived from the Chimera of Greek mythology, a fire-breathing monster that was part lion, part goat, and part dragon.” And Healthline reports, “Ancient Greek mythology includes stories of a fire-breathing creature called a chimera. This fearsome beast was a mix between a lion, goat, and serpent. But chimeras are not just a part of mythology. In real life, chimeras are animals or humans that contain the cells of two or more individuals. Their bodies contain two different sets of DNA.” Four different causes of Chimerism are: “Microchimerism” - “Artificial Chimerism” - “Twin Chimerism” & “Tetragametic Chimerism”. Artificial chimerism is “…when a person receives a blood transfusion, stem cell transplant, or bone marrow transplant from another person and absorbs some of that person’s cells.” (like in a vaccine)
“Artificial chimerism was more common in the past.” “Today, transfused blood is usually treated with radiation. This helps the transfusion or transplant recipient better absorb the new cells without permanently incorporating them into their body.” “The symptoms of chimerism vary from person to person. Many with this condition show no signs, or they may not recognize these signs as chimerism. Some symptoms include: hyperpigmentation (increased skin darkness) or hypopigmentation (increased skin lightness) in small patches or across areas as large as half of the body - two different-colored eyes - genitals that have both male and female parts (intersex), or that look sexually unclear (this sometimes results in infertility) - two or more sets of DNA present in the body’s red blood cells - possible autoimmune issues, such as those related to the skin and nervous system.”
And Dr. Anthony Komaroff from Harvard Medical School published saying, “The very first vaccines for COVID-
19 to complete phase 3 testing are an entirely new type: mRNA vaccines. Never before have mRNA vaccines (such as the two-dose Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines that have now received emergency use authorization from the FDA) been approved for use in any disease.” “Viruses contain a core of genes made of DNA or RNA wrapped in a coat of proteins. To make the coat of protein, the DNA or RNA genes of the virus make messenger RNA (mRNA); the mRNA then makes the proteins. An mRNA of a specific structure makes a protein of a specific structure. Some traditional vaccines use weakened virus, while others use just a critical piece of the virus’s protein coat. In the case of COVID-19, a piece called the spike protein is the critical piece.” (more to read about how vaccines work & the “30 years” of mRNA science & study www.health.harvard.edu/blog/why-are-mrnavaccines-so-exciting-2020121021599)
Dr. Northrup continued to say, “What is worse though is that there is a patent and work that they’ve done at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) to make a dye, and the dye is called Luciferase” (Wikipedia defines Luciferase as “a generic term for the class of oxidative enzymes that produce bioluminescence, and is usually distinguished from a photoprotein. The name was first used by Raphaël Dubois who invented the words luciferin and luciferase, for the substrate and enzyme, respectively. Both words are derived from the Latin word Lucifer – meaning lightbearer. Luciferases are widely used in biotechnology, for microscopy and as reporter genes, for many of the same applications as fluorescent proteins. However, unlike fluorescent proteins, luciferases do not require an external light source, but do require addition of luciferin, the consumable.” “A variety of organisms regulate their light production using different luciferases in a variety of light-emitting reactions. The majority of studied luciferases have been found in animals, including fireflies, and many marine animals such as copepods, jellyfish, and the sea pansy.” “Luciferases can be produced in the lab through genetic engineering for a number of purposes. Luciferase genes can be synthesized and inserted into organisms or transfected into cells. Mice, silkworms, and potatoes are just a few of the organisms that have already been engineered to produce the protein.” “In the luciferase reaction, light is emitted when luciferase acts on the appropriate luciferin substrate. Photon emission can be detected by light sensitive apparatus such as a luminometer or modified optical microscopes. This allows observation of biological processes. Since light excitation is not needed for luciferase bioluminescence, there is minimal autofluorescence and therefore virtually background-free fluorescence. Therefore, as little as 0.02 pg [picograms] can still be accurately measured using a standard scintillation counter.” “In biological research, luciferase is commonly used as a reporter to assess the transcriptional activity in cells that are transfected with a genetic construct containing the luciferase gene under the control of a promoter of interest. Additionally, proluminescent molecules that are converted to luciferin upon activity of a particular enzyme can be used to detect enzyme activity in coupled or two-step luciferase assays.” (Assay: “the testing of a metal or ore to determine its ingredients and quality.”) www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciferase
And Dr. Northrup also said “…and under a light you will be able to see who was vaccinated and who wasn’t and the deal is to store your biometric information because this vaccine will have nanoparticles, nanocrystalline particles, that are actually little robots like little antennas and they will have the ability to take your biometric data – not only your vaccine record – but your breathing, your heart rate, your activity, sexual activity, these drugs that your taking, where you travel, all of that – and then take that data and store it in the cloud.” “What’s even more concerning is that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on March 26, 2020 applied for a patent – patent number 060606 – to take that biometric data, give you a barcode and connect each of us to
cryptocurrency so that we would become literally slaves to the system - it would be the end of privacy – the end of freedom.” “Because who gets the data? Who uses the data? And what do they do with it?” “So this patent to connect the vaccinated to crypto currency, making all humans a commodity is extremely concerning and everyone should be concerned given that this is a virus that 99.9% of people recover.” “So I would ask, why do we need anything like this? Because it goes far beyond those pandemics of old, small pox and so on - this is very different - the plan here is to vaccinate the entire world and the narrative that we’re being sold is “things will not go back to normal until everyone is vaccinated.” “Vaccinated with what?” “Transfection thing like we’ve never seen before.” “And by the way, once those nanoparticles go in, there’s no detoxing from them.” “There’s no getting them out of there.” “They combine with your DNA – and your suddenly programmable and with the proposed 5G networks, the body would be an antenna where you could be controlled from outside of yourself.” “That’s kind of worse case scenario.” Then she said, “So that’s what bothers me about the vaccine.” And then she talked about the initial Moderna trials and their “high dose vaccine in very healthy people who all had severe side-effects; and in the lower dose, 80% of people had side-effects”, in which her colleague said “these are not side-effects - these are “effects”, and “some of them have this thing called Transverse myelitis” which
the Mayo Clinic said is “an inflammation of both sides of one section of the spinal cord.” “This neurological disorder often damages the insulating material covering nerve cell fibers (myelin).” “Transverse myelitis interrupts the messages that the spinal cord nerves send throughout the body. This can cause pain, muscle weakness, paralysis, sensory problems, or bladder and bowel dysfunction.”
And Jesus’s apostle John saw in the heavens on earth and wrote, “He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: his number is 666.” (Rev 13:15-18) “Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire (Truth) and brimstone (condemnation) in the presence of the holy angels (sons of God on earth in Jesus’s name) and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke (residue) of their torment ascends forever and ever (always remembered & never goes away); and they have no rest day or night (with God or the people of God or themselves & are always tormented by their words & works), who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.” “Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus Christ.” (Rev 14:9-12) “Then I heard a loud voice from the temple saying to the seven angels, “Go and pour out the bowls of the wrath of God on the earth.” “So the first went and poured out his bowl upon the earth, and a foul and loathsome sore came upon the men who had the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image.” (Rev 16:1-2) “They blasphemed the God of Heaven because of their pains and their sores, and did not repent of their deeds.” (Rev 16:11) “These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast. These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is LORD of lords and KING of kings; and those who are with Him are called Chosen and Faithful.” (Rev 17:13-14)
And after getting the vaccine, masks and social distancing are still required. ABC News reported, “As the promise of a COVID-19 vaccine is fulfilled amid the rollout of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, the need to continue wearing masks, washing your hands and maintaining social distancing remains mission critical to protecting lives. Public health measures have been the main tools at preventing infection and transmission of the virus. Wearing a face mask can reduce an individual's risk of infection by 70%.” “However, vaccines may give people a false sense of security that masks are no longer needed. Unfortunately, that is not the case.” “Vaccination teaches the body how to successfully fight a virus without actually getting sick. This is in contrast to public health measures, which rely on decreasing exposure to the virus. To effectively contain this pandemic, reducing exposure to the virus and supporting vaccination campaigns must continue.” “Here are reasons why you need to continue wearing a mask (and practice other recommended safety guidelines) during and after vaccination:
1. Vaccination does not provide instant immunity.
2. Vaccination trials did not track whether participants wore masks.
3. The real world does not mimic a controlled clinical trial.
4. The herd immunity threshold for COVID-19 is unknown.
a. “Herd immunity occurs when enough of the population is exposed to the virus, typically through vaccination, and limits the ability of the virus to spread. The percentage of population requiring immunization to achieve herd immunity varies by disease.”
5. The duration of vaccine immunity is unknown.
6. It is unclear whether vaccines prevent transmission of COVID-19.
a. In their clinical trials, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, did not track cases of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. This means the ability of the vaccine to decrease transmission was never evaluated. Future studies will need to evaluate whether vaccination decreases viral transmission before we can re-evaluate the role of public health measures.
“Vaccination significantly decreases the risk of getting sick, but it does not signal the end of public health measures.” And CTV News in Canada reported last month, “According to clinical trials from both Pfizer and Moderna, their coronavirus vaccines have been shown to be about 95% effective in preventing infections of COVID-19 with no serious side effects.” “As promising as these results are, they were only able to show if people who were vaccinated became sick with the disease and not whether vaccinated individuals could still be infected, but they don’t have any symptoms. This means there is the possibility that vaccine recipients could still unknowingly spread the virus to others because they’re asymptomatic.” “Dr. Zain Chagla, an infectious disease specialist and associate professor at McMaster University, told CTVNews.ca during a telephone interview…“There’s nothing there [in Pfizer’s data] that suggests that people are less transmissible. All we know is individuals who got the vaccine had less symptomatic disease than people who didn’t get the vaccine.” “Dr. Mario Ostrowski, an immunology professor at the University of Toronto and an infectious disease consultant at St. Michael's Hospital, said vaccine developers won’t be able to tell if vaccinated individuals can still transmit the virus until the vaccine is distributed on a large scale.”
And back in September 2020, the New Jersey Governor asked Dr. Fauci to comment on a “bright line myth” about the vaccination saying, “I got vaccinated. I could now go back into a bar without a face covering no social distancing. Don't have to wash my hands anymore. Could you react to that?" And Dr. Fauci said, “You better get that black line, that red line and erase it." "And I say you want to erase it is because that is assuming that the vaccine is a hundred percent protective and a hundred percent of the people take the vaccine, right? That's not going to happen." And “if we are lucky, we'll get a vaccine that's 70, 75% effective. And we already know that a certain percentage of the population we still need to convince to get vaccinated. So when a vaccine comes, we look at it as an important tool to supplement the public health measures that we do. It will allow us to more quickly and with less stringency, get back to some degree of normal, but it is not going to eliminate the need to be prudent and careful with our public health measures." Dr. Fauci also said, "I'd like to see a hundred percent [get vaccinated], but that's not going to happen. I think if we can get 75 to 80% of the population vaccinated, I think that would be a really good account." And Dr. Fauci recently talked about double masking because of air borne droplets, and said, “Just to be doubly sure, there are a couple of reasons to wear masks even after vaccination. One, you want to protect other people in case you have virus in your nasopharynx, and if you look in the community, there is enough virus out there that before we start pulling back on things like public health measures, you want the overwhelming population vaccinated. And as I have said, the calculation — even though it’s still an estimate — would be somewhere between 70 and 85 percent of the population.”
And now it’s now being reported [Jan. 15th] that we have two Covid-19 variants. The CDC just recently reported,
“Multiple COVID-19 variants are circulating globally: In the United Kingdom (UK), a new variant called B.1.1.7 has emerged with an unusually large number of mutations. This variant spreads more easily and quickly than other variants. Currently, there is no evidence that it causes more severe illness or increased risk of death. This variant was first detected in September 2020 and is now highly prevalent in London and southeast England. It has since been detected in numerous countries around the world, including the United States and Canada. In South Africa, another variant called 1.351 has emerged independently of the variant detected in the UK. This variant, originally detected in early October, shares some mutations with the variant detected in the UK. There have been cases caused by this variant outside of South Africa, but it has not been detected in the US. In Brazil, a variant called P.1 emerged and was identified in four travelers from Brazil, who were tested during routine screening at Haneda airport outside Tokyo, Japan. This variant contains a set of additional mutations that may affect its ability to be recognized by antibodies. This variant has not been detected in the US. These variants seem to spread more easily and quickly than other variants, which may lead to more cases of COVID-19. Currently, there is no evidence that these variants cause more severe illness or increased risk of death. However, an increase in the number of cases will put more strain on health care resources, lead to more hospitalizations, and potentially more deaths.” And the Mayo Clinic reported, “There is no evidence that these COVID-19 variants cause more-severe illness with COVID-19 or an increased risk of death due to COVID-19. In addition, new research that still needs to be finalized suggests that the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 vaccine can protect against one of the mutations found in the variants identified in the U.K. and South Africa. Further research is needed.”
I am neither for or against vaccines but am definitely vaccine hesitant and very vaccine concerned, and especially with this one. I always have been concerned about vaccines ever since my children were born in the 80’s and the doctor said they had to get vaccinated if I wanted them to go to school, which I did and wanted them to get educated and be with other children and didn’t think I could homeschool them and had to make an immediate choice on the spot without really knowing my options or have time to think about it and felt like I was forced and threatened and was very concerned for them and their health and wellbeing now with viruses, being live or synthetic (and not knowing the difference and what that meant at the time) injected into their precious little bodies never to be taken out again or removed. And I still regret those days to this day and wondered if I made the right choice; and struggled with my own viruses and vaccinations in a very severe way during my health crisis and detoxing as an adult in my 40’s.
To read article with news report links...click here
Please donate to help Open Covenant Life Ministry spread the Truth and God's Word in Truth from His Kingdom on Earth in Jesus's name as Lord.
